Florida Ethics Update: Commission on Ethics Determinations—June 2026 Meeting
June 11, 2026
During its meeting on June 5, 2026, the Florida Commission on Ethics (Commission), the constitutionally created independent agency tasked with interpreting and enforcing the State’s governmental ethics laws, took action on an array of matters involving public officials.
Public Session
Settlement of Ethics Complaint Filed Against Bradford County Zoning Director
The Commission unanimously voted to approve a draft Settlement Agreement (referred to as “Joint Stipulation”) entered into between the Bradford County Zoning Director, Randall Andrews, and the Commission’s attorney (referred to as “Advocate”) finding that he misused official resources and abused his position to obtain a disproportionate benefit when he used his County-issued email to solicit others for commercial ventures and conduct personal land sales in violation of County policies.
In light of this violation, a civil penalty of $1,000 and public censure and reprimand was recommended for imposition by the Governor.
Dismissal of Ethics Complaint Filed Against Former Community Development Board Member
The Commission unanimously voted to dismiss a complaint filed against a former member of the Board of Supervisors of the Creekside and Twin Creek North Community Development District, John Kinsey. The matter involved a statutorily required investigation initiated by the Commission to determine if Mr. Kinsey’s failure to file required financial disclosure forms in 2018 and 2019 was willful. If the Commission determines that a person has willfully failed to file financial disclosure in any calendar year, the only penalty is removal from public office.
In June 2022, the Commission found probable cause to believe that Mr. Kinsey had willfully failed or refused to file financial disclosure forms in 2018 and 2019. However, in the draft “Order Dismissing Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction” the Commission’s attorney explained that the dismissal of the complaint was warranted because facts obtained after the probable cause determination indicated that Mr. Kinsey left his public positions and no longer holds public office. The draft order further explained that because “the holding of public office or employment is necessary to invoke and maintain investigatory jurisdiction” under the financial disclosure laws “the public interest would no longer be served by further proceedings” and requested dismissal of the matter, which was ultimately granted at Friday’s meeting.
Consideration of Legal Sufficiency
A complaint filed against Kissimmee City Commissioner, Janette Martinez, was dismissed for failure to constitute a legally sufficient complaint. As no factual investigation preceded the review, the Commission’s conclusion did not reflect on the accuracy of the complaint information which alleged that the Commissioner misused her publicly provided email when she forwarded a city vendor list to her personal business email address. The complaint was considered during public session because Ms. Martinez waived confidentiality.
Dismissal of Attorney Fees Petition
The Commission considered and voted to dismiss a “Petition for Costs and Attorney Fees” filed by Darrell Thompson, Supervisor on the Long Lake Ranch CDD, against the Complainant in the underlying ethics matter which was dismissed on January 28, 2026, after a finding that the complaint lacked legal sufficiency. The ethics complaint had alleged that Mr. Thompson misused his public position and resources by excessively contacting the Board attorney resulting in $8,510 in legal bills attributable to him.
Following the dismissal of the ethics complaint, Mr. Thompson filed a “Petition for Attorney Fees and Costs” requesting that the complaint filer be required to pay $309.02 in defense counsel fees and an additional $350.00 in attorney’s fees associated with the preparation of the petition.
At Friday’s meeting the Commission considered and approved the draft “Order Dismissing Petition for Attorney Fees and Costs” which recommended dismissal because the underlying facts of the ethics complaint were true, but not implicative of the corrupt intent necessary to investigate the matter as a misuse of one’s public office. In the draft order the Commission’s attorney explained that the recovery of attorney fees was not warranted in this matter as the attorney fees and costs provision of the Ethics Code, s. 112.317(7), F.S., contains a high standard for recovery only in cases when the Commission determines that a person has filed a complaint against a public official with a malicious intent to injure the reputation of such official and with knowledge that the complaint either contains false allegations or with reckless disregard for whether the complaint contains false allegations concerning the alleged ethics violations.
Approval of Ethics Opinion Finding that Conflicts of Interest Laws Would Prohibit the Chair of a Recreation District from Simultaneously Serving on the Management Committee of an Company that is Actively Doing Business with the District
The Commission adopted draft ethics advisory opinion No. 2833 advising the Chair of the University Park Recreation District (District) that prohibited conflicts of interest would arise under ethics laws prohibiting doing business with one’s own agency, if he were to simultaneously remain as District Chair in his public capacity, and in his private capacity to serve on the Management Committee of a limited liability company (LLC) that does business with the District by providing it with professional management services.
In the opinion the Commission found that the three-person LLC Management Committee functioned as directors of the company. Following precedent, the Commission then determined that were the Chair to also serve on the LLC’s Management Committee prohibited conflicts of interest would exist because he would be both acting in his official capacity (as Chair) to purchase services from a business entity wherein he serves as a director and he would also be acting in his private capacity (on the LLC’s Management Committee) to sell services to his own agency, the District.
Approval of Ethics Opinion Advising a Teacher Regarding Ethical Implications of his Company Doing Business with the School District
The Commission also adopted draft ethics opinion No. 2843 which advised a full-time teacher at Jupiter High School that sales of a digital hall pass management software product through his company, Whitemarsh Games, LLC, and which he developed in his free time—to the Palm Beach County School District would not give rise to prohibited conflicts of interest due to the application of an exemption, provided that he did not conduct work for his private company while on the clock as a teacher.
In the opinion the Commission explained first that the teacher would not have a prohibited conflicting contractual relationship if his private business sold the software to the School District because under such an agreement, he would be doing business with the School District and not his public agency, Jupiter High School. The Commission went on to find that although there would be a facial conflict involving another conflicts of interest provision prohibiting doing business with one’s own agency or political subdivision, such a conflict could be cured via the application of an equitable exemption used in matters where the private business pursuit does not interfere with the full and faithful performance of the individual’s public duties. Analyzing the facts presented, the Commission found that because the teacher had “no role in the procurement or purchasing decisions of either your school or the School District” it was appropriate to apply the exemption to negate the conflict of interest and permit the business.
However, the Commission further cautioned the teacher to be mindful of ethical requirements which prohibit him from using his official position or information obtain in his official capacity for the special benefit of his company in his future business dealings with the District.
The opinion also states that donating the product to the District, or any school within it, would not violate the Code of Ethics.
Approval of Ethics Opinion Finding that a Member of a Bight Management Board May Continue to own a Business that Leases a Boat Slip Managed by the District without Creating a Prohibited Conflict of Interest
The Commission approved ethics opinion No. 2835 which found that no prohibited conflicts of interest would be created if a member of the Bight Management District Board (Bight Board) for the City of Key West to continue to, in his private capacity through a company that he owns, lease a boat slip at a marina that the Board manages.
The term “bight” refers to a curve or recess in a coastline. In the context of Key West the Bight Board refers to the governing body that oversees the city-owned property and leases at a historic ‘bight’ or seaport area. In the opinion the Commission explained that lease agreements concerning boat slips are formed not with the member’s own Bight Board, but instead with a different agency, and the application of an exemption for public officials “serving in a position designated for one in his professional discipline” was appropriate to negate the remaining conflict of interest as the ordinance creating the Bight Board sought representation from certain professions including the “maritime” industry in which the member is engaged in his private capacity. In the opinion the Commission reasoned that the ordinance demonstrated the City’s “intent to have an individual involved in the maritime industry represented on the Board, despite the conflicts of interest that such service might present” and thus, waiver of the facial conflict was appropriate.
The opinion also found that the member may discuss and vote on matters related to the City continuing to receive a discount on its lease of marina land from the State because any potential financial impact on the member’s business was too remote and speculative to constitute a voting conflict.
Financial Disclosure Fine Appeals
During its public session meeting, the Commission took action on 18 appeals of automatic fines assessed for late submission of financial disclosure reports submitted by public officers and employees.
Executive Session
During its closed session meeting (wherein confidential and exempt matters are addressed) the Commission took action on 110 matters. In a Press Release issued on June 10 the Commission made the following findings.
Ethics Complaints Considered for Probable Cause
During the Executive Session meeting, 11 ethics complaints were considered for probable cause. Commission determinations regarding probable cause are based upon the ethics complaint, the Report of Investigation, the Advocate’s Recommendation, as well as written statements submitted by the respondent (against whom the complaint is filed) and any oral statements made at the meeting. A finding of probable cause is not a determination that a violation has occurred. Such a determination is made only after a full evidentiary hearing on the allegations at the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).
No probable cause was found on an allegation that Timothy Nargi, as a Supervisor for the Harbor Bay Community Development District (CDD), misused his position to direct CDD service contracts, without following the proper bidding process, to companies represented by a friend.
The Commission found no probable cause to believe that Dan Curry, Walton County Commissioner, violated the constitutional amendment prohibiting abuse of office for a disproportionate benefit or misused his position to benefit himself or another person when he contacted the County Code Enforcement Department directly regarding a personal code compliance concern.
The Commission considered a complaint against Fort Pierce City Commissioner, Arnold Gaines, and found no probable cause on four allegations. The allegations were that he misused his position, had a conflicting contractual relationship, had a voting conflict, and violated the constitutional amendment prohibiting abuse of office for a disproportionate benefit when he voted on a consent agenda item that included distribution of the City’s Law Enforcement Trust Fund money to a non-profit organization where he occasionally served as its Registered Agent.
The Commission found no probable cause to believe that John Alyn Murdoch, Alachua County Veteran Services Advisory Board Member and Gainesville Fire Safety Board of Adjustments Member, misrepresented his military service or a decoration, medal title, honor, awarded qualification, or military occupational specialty from the Armed Forces of the United States for the purpose of material gain.
No probable cause was found on allegations that Ronald E. Mitchell, Lakeshore Ranch Community Development District Supervisor, misused his position in his handling of complaints against a fellow board member and friend. An allegation that Mr. Mitchell used or disclosed any information that was not available to members of the general public was also dismissed with a finding of no probable cause.
The Commission found no probable cause to believe that Joseph “Joe” Morganelli, former Montverde Town Council Member, misused his position or violated the constitutional amendment prohibiting abuse of office for a disproportionate benefit by attempting to solicit a fellow council member’s vote for Vice Mayor by threatening or otherwise bringing up permitting issues and other private capacity conduct.
The Commission considered a complaint against former Town of Welaka Mayor, Jamie Watts. The Commission found probable cause to believe that Mr. Watts misused his position and violated the constitutional amendment prohibiting abuse of office for a disproportionate benefit by sexually harassing an employee. No probable cause was found that he misused his position and violated the constitutional amendment prohibiting abuse of office for a disproportionate benefit by using the Town debit card to spend public funds on dining and alcohol while traveling for town business.
The Commission considered three related complaints filed against Devonta Knight, City of Quincy Commissioner, Beverly Nash, City of Quincy Mayor, and Lane Stephens, City of Quincy Mayor pro tem. No probable cause was found to believe that Mr. Knight, Dr. Nash, or Mr. Stephens misused their positions to hire a new City Manager who was Mr. Knight’s great-uncle.
Probable cause was found to believe that Josh Davenport, Esto Town Councilman, held public employment as the Interim Town Manager while simultaneously holding office as a member of the Esto Town Council. Allegations that Mr. Davenport misused his position, or violated the constitutional amendment prohibiting abuse of office for a disproportionate benefit to obtain the Interim Town Manager position, or served as a public officer while accepting employment from his public agency, were dismissed with a finding of no probable cause.
The Commission determined the public interest would not be served by further proceedings and dismissed allegations against George Mikitarian, President and CEO of the Parrish Medical Center.
A referral by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement regarding City of New Port Richey City Manager, Debbie Manns, was dismissed as legally insufficient.
Ethics Complaints Dismissed for Lacking Legal Sufficiency
At its meeting the Commission dismissed 97 complaints filed against the following public servants due to a lack of legal sufficiency: SETH ALDAY, Chattahoochee Police Department Lieutenant; MICHAEL RUDMAN, Oak Creek CDD Board Member; THOMAS BAKKEDAHL, 19th Judicial Circuit State Attorney; ADRIAN SEGURA, Miami-Dade County Fire Rescue Chief Fire Officer; KENNY MILLER, Hardee County Commissioner; MICHAEL TIMPANO, Sanford Police Department Lieutenant; JANET PALMER, Port St. Lucie Police Department Detective; ANTHONY ENRIQUEZ, Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office Deputy; CHAD CHRONISTER, Hillsborough County Sheriff; KEVIN COWPER. New Smyrna Beach City Manager; DANNY ROBINS, Volusia County Council member; JAKE JOHANSSON, Volusia County Councilman; KELLI MARKS, City of Orange City Mayor; JOHN HOLLOWAY, Lee County Undersheriff; THOMAS “TOM” BENTON, Harrison Ranch CDD Vice Chair; VICTOR COLOMBO, Harrison Ranch CDD Assistant Secretary; JENNIFER TUCKER, Astatula Town Clerk; two complaints against VANESSA OLIVER, Member of the Florida House of Representatives; DIEDRE LEAKS, Office of the Governor, Notary coordinator; ASHLYNN MARQUEZ, Washington County Commissioner; LUIS FIGUEREDO, Dania Beach Assistant City Attorney; WILLIAM KOON, Town of Fort White Town Councilman; SHANNON METTY, Jefferson County Manager; five complaints against DAN CURRY, Walton County Commissioner; three complaints against PAUL LARINO, Montverde Town Manager; MERLENE RAMNON, Florida Department of Health Community Health Director; ROGER MILTON, Quincy City Manager; JIM BARNARD, City of Avon Park Deputy Mayor; REGGIE GAFFNEY, JR., Jacksonville City Councilman; JUANITA BRUNSON, Quincy City Clerk; MIKE STEIGERWALD, Kissimmee City Manager; CHARLES BROADWAY, Kissimmee Chief of Police; two complaints against AMIE LYNN CALIA, State of Florida Notary Public; two complaints against DAWN FONSECA, State of Florida Notary Public; MIKE HARRISON, Gulf County Sheriff; CHRISTOPHER BUCHANAN, Gulf County Sheriff’s Office Chief Deputy; SHANE FERRELL, Gulf County Sheriff’s Office Lieutenant; CHARLES BENNETT BOLLINGER, III, 14th Judicial Circuit Assistant State Attorney; JACK HILLIGOSS, City of Lake Wales Mayor; RACHEL SNOW, Lake County Code Enforcement Officer; GLEN GUZMAN, Lake County Code Enforcement Director; MICHAEL JOSEPH, City of North Miami Beach Mayor; fifteen complaints against MICHAEL KOHLER, Escambia County Commissioner; MICHAEL J. CHITWOOD, Volusia County Sheriff; KENT KUMMERFELDT, Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office Detective; MEGAN KUMMERFELDT, Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office Deputy; CHARLOTTE WILLEBY, Gadsden County Deputy Clerk of Court; THERESA PONTIERI, City of Palm Coast Vice Mayor/County Commission candidate; MICHAEL LANE STEPHENS, Quincy Mayor Pro Tem; JOE JOHNSON, Walton County Zoning Board of Adjustments Chairman; JOSEPH MOLSEN, Cypress Shadows Community Development District Board Member; JENNIFER COLEY, New College of Florida Chief of Police; KEVIN C. KARNES, Lee County Clerk of Courts and Comptroller; CARMINE MARCENO, Lee County Sheriff; BETTY RESCH, Lake Worth Beach Mayor; NICHOLAS (NICK) NESTA, Apopka City Councilmember; NEIL COMBEE, Pok County Property Appraiser; AMANDA BROWN, Bradford County Executive Assistant in the County Manager’s office; SCOTT KORNEGAY, Bradford County Manager; SHAWN HICKS, Monroe County Code Compliance Inspector; RUBEN COLÓN, Volusia County School Board Chair; JASON JEWELL, Florida Board of Governors Chief Academic Officer and Vice Chancellor of Strategic Initiatives; WILLIAM C. LONG, Assistant State Attorney with the State Attorney’s Office of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit; JUAN JOSE ALIAGA, Cory Lakes Community Development District Board of Supervisors; ROBERT S. FITE, Bowling Green Mayor and City Commissioner; RICHARD CHESS, Fort Pierce City Manager; GREG MATOVINA, Nassau County Affordable Housing Advisory Committee member; EVAN RONALD “RON” CUTSINGER, Sarasota County Commissioner; MELISSA LOCKHART, Punta Gorda City Councilmember; RICHARD RAMSAY, Monroe County Sheriff; DANIEL J. ALFONSO, Davie City Councilmember; CHRISTOPHER CONSTANCE, Charlotte County Commissioner; REBECCA BAYS, Citrus County Commissioner; and NICK CHURILL, Pensacola State College Police Department Sergeant.
###